MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126900315 · doi:10.1016/j.anihpc.2021.01.003

Polyhomogénéité des métriques compatibles avec une structure de Lie à l'infini le long du flot de Ricci

2021· article· fr· W3126900315 on OpenAlexaff
Mahdi Ammar

Bibliographic record

VenueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non Linéaire · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldMathematics
TopicGeometric Analysis and Curvature Flows
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPhysicsPhilosophy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Résumé Le long du flot de Ricci, on étudie la polyhomogénéité des métriques pour des variétés riemanniennes non-compactes ayant « une structure de Lie fibrée à l'infini », c'est-à-dire une classe de structures de Lie à l'infini qui induit dans un sens précis des structures de fibrés sur les bords d'une certaine compactification par une variété à coins. Lorsque cette compactification est une variété à bord, cette classe de métriques contient notamment les b-métriques de Melrose, les métriques à bord fibré de Mazzeo-Melrose et les métriques edge de Mazzeo. On montre alors que la polyhomogénéité à l'infini des métriques compatibles avec une structure de Lie fibrée à l'infini est préservée localement par le flot de Ricci-DeTurck. Si la métrique initiale est asymptotiquement Einstein, on obtient la polyhomogénéité des métriques tant que le flot existe. De plus, si la métrique initiale est « lisse jusqu'au bord », alors il en sera de même pour les solutions du flot de Ricci normalisé et du flot de Ricci-DeTurck.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.006
Threshold uncertainty score0.021

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0060.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.257 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueAnnales de l Institut Henri Poincaré C Analyse Non LinéaireSame topicGeometric Analysis and Curvature FlowsFrench-language works237,207