Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract The lack of safe, timely, and effective fish passage at dams remains a major impediment to the restoration of diadromous fish species to their historic range and abundance. Because fish passage facilities are often ineffective, dam removal has increasingly been used to restore diadromous species. However, few quantitative studies have assessed the response of fishes to dam removal. This paper documents the long‐term response of multiple fish species in the Kennebec River, Maine, to the removal of two hydropower dams and the installation of upstream fish passage facilities that restored access to historic habitat. Edwards Dam was removed in 1999, and Fort Halifax Dam was removed in 2008. Counts of river herring (Alewife Alosa pseudoharengus and Blueback Herring A. aestivalis), American Shad A. sapidissima, and Striped Bass Morone saxatilis at upstream dams confirmed that these species quickly recolonized the 27‐km, free‐flowing segment of the Kennebec River that became accessible after Edwards Dam was removed. Average counts of river herring increased by 228% after the removal of Edwards Dam and by 1,425% after the removal of Fort Halifax Dam. However, access to a substantial amount of habitat in the Kennebec River is blocked by ineffective passage at the lowermost dam.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".