MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3126929729 · doi:10.17951/g.2020.67.2.37-57

Tematyka adwokatury, notariatu i komorników sądowych w świetle aktów normatywnych wydanych przez Ministerstwo byłej Dzielnicy Pruskiej

2021· article· pl· W3126929729 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.
no affNo Canadian affiliation: this work is invisible to an affiliation-only frame.
No Canadian affiliation. An affiliation-only frame, the usual design, would never have seen this work. It is one of the works that make the case for inverting the frame.

Bibliographic record

VenueStudia Iuridica Lublinensia (Uniwersytet Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej w Lublinie) · 2021
Typearticle
Languagepl
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLaw and Political Science
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsQuarter (Canadian coin)Political scienceLawEconomic JusticeChristian ministryHistoryArchaeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The aim of the article is to present the subject of the bar, notary public and court bailiffs in the light of normative acts issued by the Ministry of the former Prussian Quarter in 1919–1921 in the areas of the former Prussian partition, when supremacy over the bar, notary public and court bailiffs was exercised by the Department of Justice of the Ministry of the former Prussian Quarter.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.008
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.007
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Open science, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Research integrity, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.825
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0080.007
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0030.003
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0050.003
Bibliometrics0.0010.012
Science and technology studies0.0060.006
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0060.004
Research integrity0.0030.005
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0120.007

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.030
GPT teacher head0.322
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it