Comparative Study of the Combined Supersonic Separator and Vortex Tube Performance for Hydrocarbon Gas Drying
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Experimental investigation of the combined supersonic separator (CSS) characteristics was carried out and the results were compared with those from the vortex tube. The separator is a counter‐flow vortex tube with an energy separation chamber in the shape of a Laval nozzle; it can be used for hydrocarbon gas transportation preparation and power plant fuel gas drying. Numerical modeling was carried out to confirm the flow specifics in the examined separator structure. Although the cooling capability of the CSS is 30–50 % less than that of the vortex tube, its efficiency of moisture removal is twice as large, as is shown by the experimental research. The maximal cooling power corresponds to a cold flow fraction level of 0.39, while the range of optimal values for the moisture separation is 0.4–0.6.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it