MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127026882 · doi:10.1109/tnse.2021.3070476

Actor-Critic Learning Based QoS-Aware Scheduler for Reconfigurable Wireless Networks

2021· preprint· en· W3127026882 on OpenAlexaff
Shahram Mollahasani, Melike Erol‐Kantarci, Mahdi Hirab, Hoda Dehghan, Rodney Wilson

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and Engineering · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicAdvanced MIMO Systems Optimization
Canadian institutionsCiena (Canada)Acceleware (Canada)University of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceQuality of serviceControl reconfigurationComputer networkDistributed computingWirelessWireless networkFlexibility (engineering)Latency (audio)TelecommunicationsEmbedded system

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The flexibility offered by reconfigurable wireless networks, provide new opportunities for various applications such as online AR/VR gaming, high-quality video streaming and autonomous vehicles, that desire high-bandwidth, reliable and low-latency communications. These applications come with very stringent Quality of Service (QoS) requirements and increase the burden over mobile networks. Currently, there is a huge spectrum scarcity due to the massive data explosion and this problem can be solved by helps of Reconfigurable Wireless Networks (RWNs) where nodes have reconfiguration and perception capabilities. Therefore, a necessity of AI-assisted algorithms for resource block allocation is observed. To tackle this challenge, in this paper, we propose an actor-critic learning-based scheduler for allocating resource blocks in a RWN. Various traffic types with different QoS levels are assigned to our agents to provide more realistic results. We also include mobility in our simulations to increase the dynamicity of networks. The proposed model is compared with another actor-critic model and with other traditional schedulers; proportional fair (PF) and Channel and QoS Aware (CQA) techniques. The proposed models are evaluated by considering the delay experienced by user equipment (UEs), successful transmissions and head-of-the-line delays. The results show that the proposed model noticeably outperforms other techniques in different aspects.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.012
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.206 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations3
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Network Science and EngineeringSame topicAdvanced MIMO Systems OptimizationFrench-language works237,207