MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127065860 · doi:10.1016/j.xkme.2020.11.013

Donor Family History of ESKD and Long-term Outcomes Among African American Living Kidney Donors: A Retrospective Cohort Study

2021· article· en· W3127065860 on OpenAlexafffund
Mariella Ortigosa‐Goggins, Amit X. Garg, Lihua Li, Mona D. Doshi

Bibliographic record

VenueKidney Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicOrgan Donation and Transplantation
Canadian institutionsWestern University
FundersNational Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney DiseasesNational Heart, Lung, and Blood InstituteCanadian Institutes of Health ResearchNational Institutes of HealthAstellas Pharma US
KeywordsMedicineRenal functionFamily historyKidney diseaseCohortRetrospective cohort studyIncidence (geometry)Internal medicineAlbuminuriaKidneySurgery

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Rationale & Objective Live kidney donation is associated with a small increased risk for kidney disease and hypertension in African American donors. We investigated a possible association between donor family history of end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) and their postdonation kidney function and the development of hypertension. We tested whether this association was modified by kidney donation. Study Design Retrospective cohort. Setting & Participants Former African American live kidney donors between 1993 and 2010. Healthy nondonors were selected from the Coronary Artery Disease in Young Adults (CARDIA) Study. Exposure Family history of ESKD in a first-degree relative. Outcomes Kidney function and blood pressure ≥ 140/90 mm Hg or use of antihypertensive medications at follow-up. Analytical Approach Donors were grouped based on family history of ESKD. Outcomes were first compared between donor groups and then between donors and healthy nondonors matched for demographics, follow-up time, and family history. A mixed-effect model was used to compare outcomes. Results Of 179 donors, 139 (78%) had a first degree relative with ESKD. Predonation characteristics were similar between the 2 groups. At a median follow-up of 11 years postdonation, there was no difference in postdonation estimated glomerular filtration rates (68 ± 19 vs 69 ± 13 mL/min/1.73 m 2 ; P = 0.71) and the presence of albuminuria ( P = 0.16). There was a trend toward a higher incidence of hypertension (51% vs 35%; P = 0.08) among donors with a family history of ESKD than for those without. Although there was no difference in annual change in estimated glomerular filtration rate ( P = 0.17), the risk for hypertension was higher in donors than nondonors (relative risk, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.56-3.84]), but there was no interaction by family history ( P = 0.11). Limitations Retrospective small study. Lack of data across donor-recipient specific biological relationship. Conclusions Family history of ESKD is not associated with postdonation kidney function among African American kidney donors. Live kidney donation is associated with an increased risk for hypertension among African Americans, independent of donor family history of ESKD.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.012

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.017
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.258 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueKidney MedicineSame topicOrgan Donation and TransplantationFrench-language works237,207