MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127127016 · doi:10.1002/cjce.24059

Regular solution theory applied to asphaltene related phase behaviour

2021· article· en· W3127127016 on OpenAlexafffundvenue
Harvey W. Yarranton, F. Ramos-Pallares

Bibliographic record

VenueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical Engineering · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicPetroleum Processing and Analysis
Canadian institutionsLakehead UniversityUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsAsphaltenePrecipitationPhase (matter)Fraction (chemistry)FoulingProcess (computing)Petroleum engineeringProcess engineeringSolventPipeline (software)ThermodynamicsChemical engineeringChromatographyMaterials scienceComputer scienceChemistryOrganic chemistryEngineering

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract Asphaltenes are the least soluble fraction of crude oil and they can phase separate from the oil upon a change in temperature, pressure, or composition. This phase separation, often described as precipitation, may be beneficial (eg, in a partial deasphalting process) or detrimental (eg, in pipeline and surface equipment fouling). A phase behaviour model that can predict the onset and amount of asphaltene precipitation and is compatible with process simulators is desirable for the design and operation of these processes. This brief review focuses on the regular solution modelling approach. The regular solution model is based on activity coefficients and therefore is well suited for liquid‐liquid phase separations such as asphaltene precipitation. The model and its internal correlations are presented and its performance on asphaltene phase separation from mixtures of heavy oils and solvent is demonstrated. Recent updates to this approach are presented and potential future applications are discussed. The strengths and limitations of this approach for oilfield applications are highlighted.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.009

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.002
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.002
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0020.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.006
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.195 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueThe Canadian Journal of Chemical EngineeringSame topicPetroleum Processing and AnalysisFrench-language works237,207