MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127151323 · doi:10.32859/era.21.10.1-41

Andean Mesas and Cosmologies

2021· article· en· W3127151323 on OpenAlex
Douglas Sharon

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnobotany Research and Applications · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldArts and Humanities
TopicLatin American history and culture
Canadian institutionsYellow Island Aquaculture (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsIndigenousEthnographyLatin AmericansFocus (optics)Baseline (sea)Function (biology)EthnologyGeographyAnthropologySociologyEcologyPolitical scienceLawBiology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The purpose of the present paper is to focus on aspects of Andean culture-mesas or shamans’ altars-demonstrating how, in ritual contexts, they effectively express grass-roots cosmological principles.The baseline for this approach was provided by Sharon's (1976) survey of the anthropological literature on Latin American mesas and his suggestion that they often function as projections of indigenous cosmologies (Sharon 1978, 183-196). The current review is an updating of the survey for the Central Andes (Sharon 2006). It includes ethnographic reports from Ecuador, northern Peru, southern Peru, Bolivia, and Chile. Although the information will be grouped into a north-south framework this is not meant to imply a causal relationship.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.921
Threshold uncertainty score0.866

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.134
GPT teacher head0.353
Teacher spread0.219 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it