The C‐terminal domain of transcription factor <scp>RfaH</scp> : Folding, fold switching and energy landscape
Bibliographic record
Abstract
We simulate the folding and fold switching of the C-terminal domain (CTD) of the transcription factor RfaH using an all-atom physics-based model augmented with a dual-basin structure-based potential energy term. We show that this hybrid model captures the essential thermodynamic behavior of this metamorphic domain, that is, a change in the global free energy minimum from an α-helical hairpin to a 5-stranded β-barrel upon the dissociation of the CTD from the rest of the protein. Using Monte Carlo sampling techniques, we then analyze the energy landscape of the CTD in terms of progress variables for folding toward the two folds. We find that, below the folding transition, the energy landscape is characterized by a single, dominant funnel to the native β-barrel structure. The absence of a deep funnel to the α-helical hairpin state reflects a negligible population of this fold for the isolated CTD. We observe, however, a higher α-helix structure content in the unfolded state compared to results from a similar but fold switch-incompetent version of our model. Moreover, in folding simulations started from an extended chain conformation we find transiently formed α-helical structure, occurring early in the process and disappearing as the chain progresses toward the thermally stable β-barrel state.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".