Des intimités publiques : entre (dés)orientation et réorientation de l’intime dans les talk-shows postinsurrectionnels tunisiens
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Cet article questionne les manieres dont les intimites tunisiennes sont affectees par les emissions de talk-shows tunisiens. S’inscrivant dans les critical intimacy studies, il apprehende l’intimite comme une impression qui a lieu au moment ou un corps s’oriente vers d’autres corps ou objets. Les talk-shows tunisiens, qui sont souvent des adaptations d’emissions occidentales, mettent en visibilite et en discours les intimites. Je suggere qu’ils negocient les normes de l’intime, (1) defiant des discours normatifs qui appellent au voilement de l’intime et du peche et (2) jouant un role d’orientation, de desorientation et de reorientation – dirigeant les corps de maniere a ce que d’autres corps et objets soient (ou non) a leurs portees. A travers les extraits mentionnes dans ce texte, je montre comment ces emissions poussent leurs auditoires ainsi que leurs participantes et participants a s’aligner avec les normes locales a travers des discussions sur les intimites « aberrantes ». En meme temps, elles offrent des ressources aux personnes desorientees.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.002 | 0.005 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.006 | 0.005 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.004 | 0.002 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.003 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.005 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".