Glacial isostatic adjustment of the Pacific Coast of North America: the influence of lateral Earth structure
Bibliographic record
Abstract
SUMMARY The Pacific Coast of Central North America is a geodynamically complex region which has been subject to various geophysical processes operating on different timescales. Glacial isostatic adjustment (GIA), the ongoing deformational response of the solid Earth to past deglaciation, is an important geodynamic process in this region. In this study, we apply earth models with 3-D structure to determine if the inclusion of lateral structure can explain the poor performance of 1-D models in this region. Three different approaches are used to construct 3-D models of the Earth structure. For the first approach, we adopt an optimal 1-D viscosity structure from previous work and add lateral variations based on four global seismic shear wave velocity anomalies and two global lithosphere thickness models. The results based on these models indicate that the addition of lateral structure significantly impacts modelled RSL changes, but the data-model fits are not improved. The global seismic models are limited in spatial resolution and so two other approaches were considered to produce higher resolution models of 3-D structure: inserting a regional seismic model into two of the global seismic models and, explicitly incorporating regional structure of the Cascadia subduction zone and vicinity, that is the subducting slab, the overlying mantle wedge and the plate boundary interface. The results associated with these higher resolution models do not reveal any clear improvement in satisfying the RSL observations, suggesting that our estimates of lateral structure are inaccurate and/or the data-model misfits are primarily due to limitations in the adopted ice-loading history. The different realizations of 3-D Earth structure gives useful insight to uncertainty associated with this aspect of the GIA model. Our results indicate that improving constraints on the deglacial history of the southwest sector of the Cordilleran ice sheet is an important step towards developing more accurate of GIA models for this region.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".