MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Modelling Prime Diesel Electric Generator Fuel Consumption across Genset Sizings

2020· article· en· W3127355168 on OpenAlexaffabout
Patrick Giles, Michael Ross, Spencer Sumanik

Bibliographic record

Venue2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC) · 2020
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicEnergy Load and Power Forecasting
Canadian institutionsYukon University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsDiesel generatorDiesel fuelPrime moverSizingFuel efficiencyGenerator (circuit theory)Automotive engineeringPopulationEngineeringPower (physics)PhysicsChemistry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This study investigates a general model for fuel consumption of prime diesel generators within a set range of loadings. The model is parametrized by the rated power output, or sizing, of a generator. This research gives insight into generator fuel consumption characteristics across a wider population of generators to provide a general estimate of fuel consumption for a given sizing. Manufacturer data sheets containing fuel consumption measurements are collected online and through electric power utilities in the Canadian territories for 40 unique diesel generator sizings. The sizing group effects are accounted for through a non-pooled and multilevel regression. Subsequent estimates of linear parameters across generator sizings are modelled through ordinary least squares to obtain the desired model for fuel consumption. The generality and adequacy of this model is investigated through simulation and selected fresh data sources. The general model for prime diesel generator fuel consumption serves as a useful estimate or approximation for subsequent work that requires a general fuel efficiency estimate.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.004
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.071
Threshold uncertainty score0.142

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.004
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0020.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations2
Published2020
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue2020 IEEE Electric Power and Energy Conference (EPEC)Same topicEnergy Load and Power ForecastingFrench-language works237,207