MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127361768 · doi:10.4095/327886

Review of space weather events in solar cycle 23 (1998-2005)

2021· report· en· W3127361768 on OpenAlexaffabout
L. Trichtchenko

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typereport
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicSolar and Space Plasma Dynamics
Canadian institutionsNatural Resources Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSpace weatherMeteorologySpace (punctuation)Environmental scienceClimatologyGeographyAtmospheric sciencesComputer sciencePhysicsGeology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The presented review covers the space weather events that occurred in years 1998-2005 and includes descriptions of the solar, interplanetary and geomagnetic activity and many other parameters which describe space weather. These are presented through annual plots and short descriptions, which are useful for space weather scientists and forecasters to extract the main characteristics of the events. This provides information on the overall space weather activity: from their solar sources through the solar wind propagation to effects on the ground and in the near-earth environment. Annual plots are presented for each year showing the variation in sunspots, F10.7 flux, energetic protons and electrons on GOES, interplanetary magnetic field and solar wind parameters extracted from ACE data, global geomagnetic indices, such as PC North, Kp and Dst, and local (Canadian) geomagnetic hourly range indices at polar, auroral and subauroral stations. Each annual review also contains detailed descriptions of the major space weather events of the year. These descriptions vary from year to year and include many interesting features, from description of space weather during ExtraVehicular Activities on ISS to satellite anomalies to geomagnetically induced currents in power grids over the globe.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.647
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.284
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSolar and Space Plasma DynamicsFrench-language works237,207