MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127363048 · doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-046311

Protocol for a randomised trial evaluating a preconception-early childhood telephone-based intervention with tailored e-health resources for women and their partners to optimise growth and development among children in Canada: a Healthy Life Trajectory Initiative (HeLTI Canada)

2021· article· en· W3127363048 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Cindy‐Lee Dennis, Flavia Marini, Jennifer Abbass‐Dick, Stephanie A. Atkinson, Jon Barrett, Rhonda C. Bell, Anick Bérard, Howard Berger, Hilary K. Brown, Evelyn Constantin, Deborah Da Costa, Andrea Feller, Astrid Guttmann, Magdalena Janus, K.S. Joseph, Peter Jüni, Sarah Kimmins, Nicole Letourneau, Patricia Li, Stephen J. Lye, Jonathon L. Maguire, Stephen G. Matthews, David Millar, Dragana Misita, Kellie E. Murphy, Anne Monique Nuyt, Deborah L. O’Connor, Rulan S. Parekh, Andrew D. Paterson, Martine Puts, Joel G. Ray, Paul Roumeliotis, Stephen W. Scherer, Daniel Sellen, Sonia Semenic, Prakesh S. Shah, Graeme N. Smith, Robyn Stremler, Péter Szatmári, Deanna Telnner, Kevin E. Thorpe, Mark S. Tremblay, Simone N. Vigod, Mark Walker, Catherine S. Birken

Bibliographic record

VenueBMJ Open · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicGestational Diabetes Research and Management
Canadian institutionsWomen's College HospitalChildren's Hospital of Eastern OntarioQueen's UniversityMount Sinai HospitalLunenfeld-Tanenbaum Research InstituteHealth Sciences CentreUniversity of CalgaryUniversity of British ColumbiaPublic Health OntarioHospital for Sick ChildrenOntario Tech UniversityUniversité de MontréalUniversity of AlbertaUniversity of OttawaInstitute for Clinical Evaluative SciencesMcGill UniversityMcGill University Health CentreRegional Municipality of NiagaraSt. Michael's HospitalSunnybrook Health Science CentreOttawa HospitalCentre Hospitalier Universitaire Sainte-JustineMcMaster UniversityUniversity of TorontoCentre for Addiction and Mental Health
FundersCanadian Institutes of Health Research
KeywordsMedicineRandomized controlled trialPublic healthIntervention (counseling)OverweightEarly childhoodChildhood obesityGerontologyChild developmentFamily medicinePediatricsPhysical therapyObesityNursingDevelopmental psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

INTRODUCTION: The 'Developmental Origins of Health and Disease' hypothesis suggests that a healthy trajectory of growth and development in pregnancy and early childhood is necessary for optimal health, development and lifetime well-being. The purpose of this paper is to present the protocol for a randomised controlled trial evaluating a preconception-early childhood telephone-based intervention with tailored e-health resources for women and their partners to optimise growth and development among children in Canada: a Healthy Life Trajectory Initiative (HeLTI Canada). The primary objective of HeLTI Canada is to determine whether a 4-phase 'preconception to early childhood' lifecourse intervention can reduce the rate of child overweight and obesity. Secondary objectives include improved child: (1) growth trajectories; (2) cardiometabolic risk factors; (3) health behaviours, including nutrition, physical activity, sedentary behaviour and sleep; and (4) development and school readiness at age 5 years. METHOD AND ANALYSIS: A randomised controlled multicentre trial will be conducted in two of Canada's highly populous provinces-Alberta and Ontario-with 786 nulliparous (15%) and 4444 primiparous (85%) women, their partners and, when possible, the first 'sibling child.' The intervention is telephone-based collaborative care delivered by experienced public health nurses trained in healthy conversation skills that includes detailed risk assessments, individualised structured management plans, scheduled follow-up calls, and access to a web-based app with individualised, evidence-based resources. An 'index child' conceived after randomisation will be followed until age 5 years and assessed for the primary and secondary outcomes. Pregnancy, infancy (age 2 years) and parental outcomes across time will also be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has received approval from Clinical Trials Ontario (CTO 1776). The findings will be published in peer-reviewed journals and disseminated to policymakers at local, national and international agencies. Findings will also be shared with study participants and their communities. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN13308752; Pre-results.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.044
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.049
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Randomized trial · Consensus signal: Randomized trial
GenreCandidate signal: Protocol · Consensus signal: Protocol
Teacher disagreement score0.990
Threshold uncertainty score0.468

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0440.049
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0070.004
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0100.007
Bibliometrics0.0030.005
Science and technology studies0.0050.005
Scholarly communication0.0040.004
Open science0.0050.003
Research integrity0.0110.012
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.1400.022

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.095
GPT teacher head0.406
Teacher spread0.311 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designRandomized trial
Domainnot available
GenreProtocol

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations31
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueBMJ OpenSame topicGestational Diabetes Research and ManagementFrench-language works237,207