MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3127378540 · doi:10.14740/jmc3643

Recurrent Hyperparathyroidism Following Successful Four-Gland Parathyroidectomy and Normalization of Parathyroid Hormone in a Renal Transplant Patient

2021· article· en· W3127378540 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Ryan Petrucci, David Johnston, Tamara Preda

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Medical Cases · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineSecondary hyperparathyroidismSupernumeraryParathyroidectomyParathyroid hormoneHyperparathyroidismParathyroid glandKidney diseaseSurgeryKidneyUrologyInternal medicineAnatomy

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Chronic kidney disease has an estimated prevalence of 10% in Australia and is predicted to rise in the coming years. Secondary hyperparathyroidism resulting from chronic kidney disease is an important cause of morbidity in these patients; and screening for secondary hyperparathyroidism is recommended in international guidelines. We present the case of a chronic kidney disease patient who developed recurrent hyperparathyroidism despite previous "total" parathyroidectomy and subsequent renal transplant. After targeted investigations he was diagnosed with an accessory parathyroid gland in his thorax, causing the recurrent hyperparathyroidism. He was managed with a thoracoscopic excision with a resultant drop in parathyroid hormone consistent with surgical cure. This case highlights the rare phenomenon of supernumerary and ectopic parathyroid glands. Cross sectional thoracic imaging can and should be used to detect and localize supernumerary glands not apparent at the time of original surgery.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.004
Threshold uncertainty score0.011

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0020.001
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0040.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.021
GPT teacher head0.291
Teacher spread0.269 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Medical Cases→Same topicParathyroid Disorders and Treatments→French-language works237,207→