MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127399490 · doi:10.2749/vancouver.2017.0746

Preserving a Well-loved Heritage Structure

2017· article· en· W3127399490 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Ian Walters, Casey Leggett

Bibliographic record

VenueReport · 2017
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicStructural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsBridge (graph theory)RehabilitationTourismWork (physics)Plan (archaeology)Gateway (web page)ClubKey (lock)Asset (computer security)SkylineBusinessComputer scienceArchitectural engineeringEngineeringPolitical scienceGeographyComputer securityCivil engineeringPsychologyWorld Wide WebMedicine

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

One of Metro Vancouver’s oldest, most interesting and historic structures, the Westham Island Bridge is the single gateway onto Westham Island in Delta, BC, which is home to key agricultural developments, a sports club, and popular local tourist attractions. Now entering its 106th year, the Westham Island Bridge needs a comprehensive structural assessment and rehabilitation study that will consider extending the structure’s life for another 20 to 25 years such that it can continue to provide safe and reliable access to the island. Mott MacDonald has been retained by the Owner to undertake this asset preservation work in three phases comprising a comprehensive structural assessment and rehabilitation plan, detailed design of the rehabilitation works and construction support. This paper describes the recent work undertaken in Phase 1 to formulate a cost effective rehabilitation strategy for the bridge.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.050
Threshold uncertainty score0.099

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0100.002

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.008
GPT teacher head0.231
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2017
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueReportSame topicStructural Engineering and Vibration AnalysisFrench-language works237,207