MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127415993 · doi:10.1017/cjn.2021.21

Segmental Myoclonus and Epilepsy in a Child with GAD 65 Antibodies

2021· article· en· W3127415993 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Michael S. Salman, Qi Xu, Martin Bunge, Werner Ilse, Kerstin Gerhold, Sean Udow

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences Neurologiques · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMedicine
TopicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and Treatments
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Manitoba
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMyoclonusContent (measure theory)EpilepsyAction (physics)NeurosciencePsychologyMedicineMathematicsPhysics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Keywords: GAD 65 antibodies, Child, Myoclonus, Epilepsy Glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD) is a rate-limiting enzyme for the synthesis of γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA), an inhibitory neurotransmitter.It is widely distributed in the central nervous system but is also present in other organs, especially the pancreas.Elevated GAD 65 antibodies have diverse clinical associations, including stiff person syndrome (SPS), cerebellar ataxia, limbic encephalitis, epilepsy, ocular motor disorders, type 1 diabetes mellitus, 1,2 and rarely myoclonus.3-6 GAD 65 antibody-associated neurological syndromes, mostly SPS or epilepsy, are rarely reported in pediatrics.2,7 Many patients improve after immune therapy and some, whose presentation includes seizures, become seizure free. 1 Elevated GAD 65 antibodies may be associated with tumors.However, such an association is rare in children. 1 A 7.5-year-old-girl, previously healthy and intellectually normal, presented with a few days history of self-limited right-sided throbbing headache and a new-onset focal tonicclonic seizure with bilateral spread lasting 5 min.She concurrently developed right sided then bilateral continuous, high frequency, semi-rhythmic facial muscle twitching, consistent with myoclonus, most prominent on the right face and upper lip (Video).The myoclonus was present during wakefulness and sleep.Six weeks later, the myoclonus spread to her right thumb and tongue.She did not develop myoclonus anywhere else.She did not feel the myoclonus.The myoclonus responded partially to treatment with clonazepam.Levetiracetam was started following a second, 2.5 min focal unaware seizure, 10 d after the first seizure.There were no signs of encephalopathy, cognitive decline, or regression.She could eat, drink, and speak normally.Pregnancy, delivery, development, and past medical history were unremarkable.Parents are non-consanguineous.There was no family history of seizures, autoimmune, or movement disorders.The patient's full neurological exam was normal apart from the myoclonus.Blood tests were normal including CBC, extended electrolytes, glucose, liver and thyroid function, uric acid, copper, ceruloplasmin, ESR, CRP, C3, C4, immunoglobulins, rheumatoid factor, ANCAs, anti-TPO, and phospholipid (cardiolipin and β2-glycoprotein) antibodies.ANA screen was positive (low titers at 1:40 for speckled and 1:80 for nucleolar antinuclear antibodies detected by immunofluorescence), but dsDNA and extractable nuclear antigens were negative.Urinary vanillylmandelic acid and homovanillic acid were negative.CSF investigations revealed normal glucose and lactate, with a slightly elevated protein (0.29 g/l, normal range: 0.12-0.24)and cell count (8 cells, 97% lymphocytes).Oligoclonal bands were present in the CSF with no corresponding bands in the serum.GAD 65 antibodies were 'highly positive' in CSF and serum as tested by a cell-based immunoassay (CBA: Euroimmun AG, Luebeck, Germany), performed by MitogenDx, Calgary, Canada.Serum level of anti-GAD 65 as tested by an enzyme-linked

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Case report · Consensus signal: Case report
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.014
Threshold uncertainty score0.027

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.001
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0030.002
Science and technology studies0.0020.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.002
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0030.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0030.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.019
GPT teacher head0.256
Teacher spread0.237 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designCase report
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations1
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of Neurological Sciences / Journal Canadien des Sciences NeurologiquesSame topicAutoimmune Neurological Disorders and TreatmentsFrench-language works237,207