MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127427300 · doi:10.7202/1074947ar

Les reconversions des manufactures françaises des tabacs

2021· article· fr· W3127427300 on OpenAlexvenueno aff
Paul Smith

Bibliographic record

VenueEthnologies · 2021
Typearticle
Languagefr
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicFrench Urban and Social Studies
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesPolitical scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Depuis la fermeture, en 2017, de l’usine à cigarettes de Riom (Puy-de-Dôme), l’industrie des tabacs n’existe plus en France. Elle remontait au XVIIe siècle et pour la plus grande partie de son histoire elle avait été monopolisée par l’État, un monopole fiscal exploité par des compagnies de fermiers sous l’Ancien Régime puis par une administration placée sous la tutelle du ministère des Finances au XIXe et XXe siècles. Cette industrie d’État nous lègue aujourd’hui un échantillon remarquable d’établissements manufacturiers, témoignant de trois siècles d’architecture industrielle. Notre article porte un regard sur le devenir de ces établissements après leur abandon par l’industrie. Les nouveaux usages insérés dans les murs sont très variés — logements, locaux d’enseignement, équipements culturels, lieux d’activités, hôtels, espaces tertiaires… — mais ils soulèvent tous la question de l’interprétation, sur place, de l’histoire des lieux et celle aussi de la sauvegarde du patrimoine technique de l’industrie. Ces questions sont posées en examinant de plus près quatre opérations de reconversion, à Issy-les-Moulineaux en banlieue parisienne et à Nantes, au début des années 1980, puis, plus récemment, à Morlaix (Finistère) et à Marseille.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.227
Threshold uncertainty score0.451

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0030.001
Scholarly communication0.0030.001
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0180.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.126
GPT teacher head0.319
Teacher spread0.193 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueEthnologiesSame topicFrench Urban and Social StudiesFrench-language works237,207