Outils numériques soutenant les processus de régulation dans une communauté de coélaboration de connaissances
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Dans le cadre d’un cours universitaire aux cycles supérieurs, six étudiants en sciences de l’éducation ont coélaboré sur le thème de l'équité numérique en présence et en ligne à l’aide du Knowledge Forum et de Google Drive. À la suite de cette expérience, une question s’est posée : comment maximiser le fonctionnement d’une communauté de coélaboration de connaissances dans un mode de formation hybride afin de favoriser la cocréation de connaissances? Les recommandations qui découlent de cette analyse concernent les différents processus de régulation, les fonctionnalités des outils numériques et les influences mutuelles des contextes de coélaboration. Enfin, deux outils numériques permettant à la communauté d’assurer une régulation partagée seront présentés.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.004 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.002 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".