MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127504196 · doi:10.1142/s0219455421500838

Nonlinear Dynamic Analysis and Control of FG Cylindrical Shell Fitted with Piezoelectric Layers

2021· article· en· W3127504196 on OpenAlexaff
Aliakbar Bayat, Amir Jalali, Habib Ahmadi

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and Dynamics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicComposite Structure Analysis and Optimization
Canadian institutionsToronto Metropolitan University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsGalerkin methodPhase portraitNonlinear systemVibrationPhysicsEquations of motionParametric oscillatorControl theory (sociology)Shell (structure)Multiple-scale analysisParametric statisticsHamilton's principleOrdinary differential equationMechanicsMathematical analysisClassical mechanicsBifurcationDifferential equationMathematicsMaterials scienceAcousticsOpticsComputer science

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In this study, the nonlinear vibration control of functionally graded laminated piezoelectric cylindrical shells under simultaneous parametric axial and radial external excitations is presented. The partial differential equations of shells are derived based on Hamilton’s principle, first-order shear deformation theory (FSDT), and nonlinear von Karman relations. The coupled nonlinear ordinary differential equations are obtained by Galerkin’s procedure and solved by the method of static condensation. Two piezoelectric layers are placed on the outer and inner surfaces of the cylindrical shell each as distributed sensor and actuator. Then the constant-gain negative velocity feedback strategy is employed. Regarding the nonlinear equations of motion, for the first time, the vibration analysis and active vibration control of smart FG cylindrical shells under combined parametric and external excitations are analyzed using the multiple scales approach. The effects of various parameters such as power index, external excitation’s amplitude, and control gain on the dynamic behavior of the system are investigated, using bifurcation diagrams, phase portraits, time histories, and Poincare maps. It is shown that quasi-periodic motion is the most common behavior of the system and controller gain and power index have inevitable effects on enhancing the quasi-periodic response of the system. Care should be exerted in selecting the parameters to have the desired response in the broad range of excitation frequency.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.001
Threshold uncertainty score0.002

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.002
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Structural Stability and DynamicsSame topicComposite Structure Analysis and OptimizationFrench-language works237,207