MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127582594 · doi:10.46292/sci20-00001

Validity and Reliability of Surface Electromyography Features in Lower Extremity Muscle Contraction in Healthy and Spinal Cord–Injured Participants

2021· article· en· W3127582594 on OpenAlexaff
Jordan Silverman, Gustavo Balbinot, Kei Masani, José Zariffa, P. Eng

Bibliographic record

VenueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury Rehabilitation · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicMuscle activation and electromyography studies
Canadian institutionsToronto Rehabilitation InstituteUniversity of TorontoUniversity Health Network
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMedicineIntraclass correlationIsometric exercisePhysical medicine and rehabilitationElectromyographySpinal cord injuryPhysical therapyReliability (semiconductor)Tibialis anterior muscleSpinal cordSkeletal muscleAnatomyPsychometrics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Background: Spinal cord injury (SCI) has a significant impact on motor control and active force generation. Quantifying muscle activation following SCI may help indicate the degree of motor impairment and predict the efficacy of rehabilitative interventions. In healthy persons, muscle activation is typically quantified by electromyographic (EMG) signal amplitude measures. However, in SCI, these measures may not reflect voluntary effort, and therefore other nonamplitude-based features should be considered. Objectives: The purpose of this study was to assess the correlation of time-domain EMG features with the exerted joint torque (validity) and their test-retest repeatability (reliability), which may contribute to characterizing muscle activation following SCI. Methods: Surface EMG (SEMG) and torque were measured while nine uninjured participants and four participants with SCI performed isometric contractions of tibialis anterior (TA) and soleus (SOL). Data collection was repeated at a subsequent session for comparison across days. Validity and test-retest reliability of features were assessed by Spearman and intraclass correlation (ICC) of linear regression coefficients. Results: In healthy participants, SEMG features correlated well with torque (TA: ρ > 0.92; SOL: ρ > 0.94) and showed high reliability (ICC mean = 0.90; range, 0.72–0.99). In an SCI case series, SEMG features also correlated well with torque (TA: ρ > 0.86; SOL: ρ > 0.86), and time-domain features appeared no less repeatable than amplitude-based measures. Conclusion: Time-domain SEMG features are valid and reliable measures of lower extremity muscle activity in healthy participants and may be valid measures of sublesional muscle activity following SCI. These features could be used to gauge motor impairment and progression of rehabilitative interventions or in controlling assistive technologies.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.007
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.026
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.007
Threshold uncertainty score0.039

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0070.026
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.001
Open science0.0010.001
Research integrity0.0010.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.317
Teacher spread0.293 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueTopics in Spinal Cord Injury RehabilitationSame topicMuscle activation and electromyography studiesFrench-language works237,207