MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127664817 · doi:10.51826/fokus.v18i2.422

PELAYANAN PENDAFTARAN HAK ATAS TANAH

2020· article· id· W3127664817 on OpenAlex
Hengky Barnabas, Gunawan Gunawan

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFOKUS Publikasi Ilmiah untuk Mahasiswa Staf Pengajar dan Alumni Universitas Kapuas Sintang · 2020
Typearticle
Languageid
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicLegal Studies and Policies
Canadian institutionsEncana (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesComputer scienceArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Penelitian ini menganalisis kualitas pelayanan pendaftaran tanah secara konversi sporadik di Kantor Pertanahan Nasiona Kabupaten Sintang dengan Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan jenis penelitian Deskriptif. Hasil penelitian 1) Prosedur Pendaftran Tanah di BPN Kabupaten Sintang telah dilaksanakan sesuai dengan aturan namun prosesnnya memliiki kendala lamanya waktu dan tahapan Pendaftran tanah yang rumit bagi beberapa pemohon yang pertama kali. 2) Standar pelayanan pendaftaran Tanah cukup memberikan kenyamanan dan kemudahan informasi secara online maupun offline., fasilitas di dalam ruang tunggu cukup nyaman. 3) SDM cukup baik dan profesioanl

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Science and technology studies, Scholarly communication, Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow), Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.795
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0020.002
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0020.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.004
Science and technology studies0.0060.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.003
Open science0.0040.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0110.003

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.029
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.223 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it