MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127672653 · doi:10.1002/mrm.28691

Characterization and compensation of inhomogeneity artifact in spiral hyperpolarized<sup>13</sup>C imaging of the human heart

2021· article· en· W3127672653 on OpenAlexaff
Galen D. Reed, Junjie Ma, Jae Mo Park, Rolf F. Schulte, Crystal Harrison, Albert P. Chen, Salvador Peña Martín, Jeannie Baxter, Kelly Derner, Maida Tai, Jaffar Ali Raza, Jeff Liticker, Ronald G. Hall, A. Dean Sherry, Vlad G. Zaha, Craig R. Malloy

Bibliographic record

VenueMagnetic Resonance in Medicine · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldChemistry
TopicAdvanced NMR Techniques and Applications
Canadian institutionsGeneral Electric (Canada)
FundersNational Center for Research ResourcesNational Institute of Biomedical Imaging and BioengineeringNational Institutes of Health
KeywordsImage qualitySpiral (railway)Full width at half maximumWaveformArtifact (error)Nuclear medicineSIGNAL (programming language)PhysicsNuclear magnetic resonanceOpticsBiomedical engineeringMathematicsMedicineComputer scienceImage (mathematics)Artificial intelligence

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose This study aimed to investigate the role of regional inhomogeneity in spiral hyperpolarized 13 C image quality and to develop measures to alleviate these effects. Methods Field map correction of hyperpolarized 13 C cardiac imaging using spiral readouts was evaluated in healthy subjects. Spiral readouts with differing duration (26 and 45 ms) but similar resolution were compared with respect to off‐resonance performance and image quality. An map‐based image correction based on the multifrequency interpolation (MFI) method was implemented and compared to correction using a global frequency shift alone. Estimation of an unknown frequency shift was performed by maximizing a sharpness objective based on the Sobel variance. The apparent full width half at maximum (FWHM) of the myocardial wall on [ 13 C]bicarbonate was used to estimate blur. Results Mean myocardial wall FWHM measurements were unchanged with the short readout pre‐correction (14.1 ± 2.9 mm) and post‐MFI correction (14.1 ± 3.4 mm), but significantly decreased in the long waveform (20.6 ± 6.6 mm uncorrected, 17.7 ± 7.0 corrected, P = .007). Bicarbonate signal‐to‐noise ratio ( SNR ) of the images acquired with the long waveform were increased by 1.4 ± 0.3 compared to those acquired with the short waveform (predicted 1.32). Improvement of image quality was observed for all metabolites with correction. Conclusions ‐map correction reduced blur and recovered signal from dropouts, particularly along the posterior myocardial wall. The low image SNR of [ 13 C]bicarbonate can be compensated with longer duration readouts but at the expense of increased artifacts, which can be partially corrected for with the proposed methods.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.495
Threshold uncertainty score0.291

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.016
GPT teacher head0.280
Teacher spread0.264 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations16
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueMagnetic Resonance in MedicineSame topicAdvanced NMR Techniques and ApplicationsFrench-language works237,207