MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127695467 · doi:10.3997/1365-2397.fb2021013

Measurement, monitoring, verification and modelling at the Aquistore CO2 storage site

2021· article· en· W3127695467 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueFirst Break · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicModeling, Simulation, and Optimization
Canadian institutionsUniversity of AlbertaPetroleum Technology Research Centre
Fundersnot available
KeywordsParagraphDisclaimerDirectiveComputer scienceOrder (exchange)Information retrievalData sciencePolitical scienceBusinessLawWorld Wide Web

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Disclaimer Text and Data Mining. Any automated analytical technique aimed at analysing text and data in digital form in order to generate information including - but not limited to - patterns, trends and correlations (so-called Text and Data Mining) may only be applied if it is done by a research organisation or cultural heritage institution solely for the purpose of (non-commercial) scientific research as mentioned in Clause 3 of Directive (EU) 2019/790 (the Digital Single Market Directive) and Clause 15n of the Dutch Copyright Act [Auteurswet]. Text and Data Mining for commercial purposes is not allowed; all rights in this respect are reserved pursuant to Clause 4 paragraph 3 of the Digital Single Market Directive and Clause 15o paragraph 1 of the Dutch Copyright Act.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.419
Threshold uncertainty score0.386

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.090
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.186 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it