MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127833642 · doi:10.1109/tsmc.2021.3050507

Velocity-Free Saturated Control for Spacecraft Proximity Operations With Guaranteed Safety

2021· article· en· W3127833642 on OpenAlexaff
Qinglei Hu, Yueyang Liu, Youmin Zhang

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics Systems · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEngineering
TopicSpace Satellite Systems and Control
Canadian institutionsConcordia University
FundersNatural Science Foundation of Beijing MunicipalityNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSpacecraftMaxima and minimaControl theory (sociology)Lyapunov functionActuatorController (irrigation)Limit (mathematics)Computer scienceStability (learning theory)Control (management)Function (biology)Path (computing)MathematicsEngineeringPhysicsAerospace engineeringNonlinear systemMathematical analysis

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

This article details the development and evaluation of a practical solution for path-constrained proximity maneuvers of spacecraft. Whereas no velocity measurement is utilized within the feedback structure, the controller rigorously enforces actuator magnitude constraints. Specifically, the control algorithm is constructed from a potential function method repelling the spacecraft from possible collisions. The proposed controller can guarantee potential functions to be navigated to the origin and thus overcome the stubborn local minima problem. Moreover, the control capability under any given control limit can be estimated and adjusted by changing the feedback gains. The specific performance with guaranteed safety can be also explicitly calculated by designers. The results are obtained through a Lyapunov-based stability analysis to prove uniformly ultimate boundedness. Numerical simulation results illustrate the performance and features of the developed control method.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.979
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.189
Teacher spread0.182 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations12
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on Systems Man and Cybernetics SystemsSame topicSpace Satellite Systems and ControlFrench-language works237,207