MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127874933 · doi:10.1109/tc.2007.250622

Low-Weight Polynomial Form Integers for Efficient Modular Multiplication

2006· article· en· W3127874933 on OpenAlexafffund
Jae-Wook Chung, M.A. Hasan

Bibliographic record

VenueIEEE Transactions on Computers · 2006
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicCryptography and Residue Arithmetic
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada
KeywordsModular arithmeticMathematicsModuliElliptic curveMersenne primeInteger (computer science)PolynomialPrime (order theory)Finite fieldDiscrete mathematicsMultiplication (music)CryptosystemArithmeticCryptographyPure mathematicsCombinatoricsComputer scienceAlgorithm

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

In 1999, Solinas introduced families of moduli called the generalized Mersenne numbers (GMNs), which are expressed in low-weight polynomial form, p=f(t), where t is limited to a power of 2. GMNs are very useful in elliptic curve cryptosystems over prime fields since modular reduction by a GMN requires only integer additions and subtractions. However, since there are not many GMNs and each GMN requires a dedicated implementation, GMNs are hardly useful for other cryptosystems. Here, we modify GMN by removing restriction on the choice of t and restricting the coefficients of f(t) to 0 and plusmn1. We call such families of moduli low-weight polynomial form integers (LWPFIs). We show an efficient modular multiplication method using LWPFI moduli. LWPFIs allow general implementation and there exist many LWPFI moduli. One may consider LWPFIs as a trade-off between general integers and GMNs

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Methods · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.885
Threshold uncertainty score0.764

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.007
GPT teacher head0.211
Teacher spread0.204 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreMethods

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2006
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueIEEE Transactions on ComputersSame topicCryptography and Residue ArithmeticFrench-language works237,207