MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127887927 · doi:10.48550/arxiv.2102.02809

Cutoff for Almost All Random Walks on Abelian Groups

2021· preprint· en· W3127887927 on OpenAlexaff
Jonathan Hermon, Sam Olesker-Taylor

Bibliographic record

VenuearXiv (Cornell University) · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicStochastic processes and statistical mechanics
Canadian institutionsUniversity of British Columbia
FundersEngineering and Physical Sciences Research Council
KeywordsMathematicsCombinatoricsConjectureCayley graphAbelian groupCutoffRandom walkOrder (exchange)Discrete mathematicsGraphStatisticsPhysicsQuantum mechanics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Consider the random Cayley graph of a finite group $G$ with respect to $k$ generators chosen uniformly at random, with $1 \ll \log k \ll \log |G|$; denote it $G_k$. A conjecture of Aldous and Diaconis (1985) asserts, for $k \gg \log |G|$, that the random walk on this graph exhibits cutoff. Further, the cutoff time should be a function only of $k$ and $|G|$, to sub-leading order. This was verified for all Abelian groups in the '90s. We extend the conjecture to $1 \ll k \lesssim \log |G|$. We establish cutoff for all Abelian groups under the condition $k - d(G) \gg 1$, where $d(G)$ is the minimal size of a generating subset of $G$, which is almost optimal. The cutoff time is described (abstractly) in terms of the entropy of random walk on $\mathbb Z^k$. This abstract definition allows us to deduce that the cutoff time can be written as a function only of $k$ and $|G|$ when $d(G) \ll \log |G|$ and $k - d(G) \asymp k \gg 1$; this is not the case when $d(G) \asymp \log |G| \asymp k$. For certain regimes of $k$, we find the limit profile of the convergence to equilibrium. Wilson (1997) conjectured that $\mathbb Z_2^d$ gives rise to the slowest mixing time for $G_k$ amongst all groups of size at most $2^d$. We give a partial answer, verifying the conjecture for nilpotent groups. This is obtained via a comparison result of independent interest between the mixing times of nilpotent $G$ and a corresponding Abelian group $\overline G$, namely the direct sum of the Abelian quotients in the lower central series of $G$. We use this to refine a celebrated result of Alon and Roichman (1994): we show for nilpotent $G$ that $G_k$ is an expander provided $k - d(\overline G) \gtrsim \log |G|$. As another consequence, we establish cutoff for nilpotent groups with relatively small commutators, including high-dimensional special groups, such as Heisenberg groups.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.002
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.014
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.005
Threshold uncertainty score0.018

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0020.014
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.001
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.002
Scholarly communication0.0020.004
Open science0.0010.002
Research integrity0.0010.002
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.166
GPT teacher head0.252
Teacher spread0.086 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designTheoretical or conceptual
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations8
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuearXiv (Cornell University)Same topicStochastic processes and statistical mechanicsFrench-language works237,207