MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort

Achieving Ultimate Noise Tolerance in Quantum Communication

2021· article· en· W3127890241 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenuePhysical Review Applied · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldComputer Science
TopicQuantum Information and Cryptography
Canadian institutionsUniversity of OttawaNational Research Council Canada
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer scienceNoise (video)Quantum information scienceQuantumPhotonQuantum cryptographyMode (computer interface)Quantum networkTelecommunicationsPhysicsQuantum informationOpticsQuantum mechanicsQuantum entanglementArtificial intelligenceHuman–computer interaction

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Quantum communication is the most advanced cryptographic method to distribute secret keys securely through public channels, but actual performance is still limited, due to noise. This study explores the ultimate noise tolerance of quantum communication by considering a method based on spectral, temporal, and spatial mode filtering of single photons with high efficiency. The authors also show that by actively filtering photons to a nearly single mode, quantum communication can occur in environments that are noisier by three orders of magnitude than what traditional methods tolerate. This approach could bring quantum communication under realistic conditions a step closer to reality.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.814
Threshold uncertainty score0.427

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.014
GPT teacher head0.285
Teacher spread0.271 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it