MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127894400 · doi:10.1145/3436349.3436364

Signal-to-Noise Ratio Improvement Using Multiplexed Illumination with Scattering Media

2020· article· en· W3127894400 on OpenAlexaff
Benjamin T. Cecchetto, James E. Stewart

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPhysics and Astronomy
TopicAdvanced Optical Sensing Technologies
Canadian institutionsQueen's University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsRadianceAttenuationOpticsDetectorMultiplexingScatteringSignal-to-noise ratio (imaging)Light scatteringNoise (video)SIGNAL (programming language)Computer sciencePhysicsTelecommunicationsArtificial intelligenceImage (mathematics)

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Empirical measurement of the attenuation of a light ray (i.e. a laser beam) through a scattering medium is challenging because the radiance of the exiting light is near the noise floor of the detector. The SNR can be improved with multiplexed illumination, where several different rays are sent simultaneously resulting in much higher outgoing radiance. The contribution of an individual ray is determined by solving a linear system. We perform an experiment to determine the empirical improvement in SNR using multiplexed illumination in place of single-ray illumination. The experiment shows that the empirical improvement does not follow the predicted theoretical improvement.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.358
Threshold uncertainty score0.363

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.022
GPT teacher head0.241
Teacher spread0.220 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicAdvanced Optical Sensing TechnologiesFrench-language works237,207