MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127901147 · doi:10.3138/cjcrim.43.1.85

Prisoners of isolation: Research on the effects of administrative segregation

2001· article· en· W3127901147 on OpenAlexaffvenueabout
Julian V. Roberts, Robert J. Gebotys

Bibliographic record

VenueCanadian Journal of Criminology · 2001
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicCriminal Justice and Corrections Analysis
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier UniversityUniversity of Ottawa
Fundersnot available
KeywordsImprisonmentCriminologyIsolation (microbiology)SociologyPsychologyPolitical scienceLaw

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The research reported by Zinger, Wichmann, and Andrews in this issue of the journal raises some familiar themes. As Landreville and Lemonde observe in their commentary, the debate over the effects of imprisonment goes back some time. In October 1984, the Canadian Journal of Criminology devoted a special issue to the effects of incarceration. More recently, Bonta and Gendreau (1990) reviewed the literature on the effects of incarceration and concluded that they were not as negative as many people to that point had asserted.11 They came to this conclusion based on a review of the published, quantitative literature. Michael Jackson and I demurred (Roberts and Jackson 1991).

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.002
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Qualitative · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.684
Threshold uncertainty score0.971

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.002
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.227
GPT teacher head0.425
Teacher spread0.198 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designQualitative
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations9
Published2001
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueCanadian Journal of CriminologySame topicCriminal Justice and Corrections AnalysisFrench-language works237,207