MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127915238 · doi:10.4289/0013-8797.123.1.244

Corythaica bellula Torre-Bueno (Hemiptera: Tingidae): Scribner's Panicgrass, Dichanthelium oligosanthes subsp. Scribnerianum, as a Host Plant in the Nebraska Sandhills

2021· article· en· W3127915238 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
A. G. Wheeler

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the Entomological Society of Washington · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicPlant Taxonomy and Phylogenetics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTingidaeNymphHemipteraGenusBiologyBionomicsBotanyHost (biology)GeographyZoologyEcologyLarva

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

The lace bug Corythaica bellula Torre-Bueno is one of four North American species in this mainly Neotropical genus. All species known from Canada and the United States are seldom collected and their bionomics little known. Adults and nymphs of C. bellula were collected from Scribner's panicgrass (Dichanthelium oligosanthes subsp. scribnerianum [Nash] Freckmann and Lelong; Poaceae) in 12 counties of the Nebraska Sandhills. Its collection in South Dakota from this host represents a new state record. The panicoid grass is the tingid's second host plant identified to species level. All adult males (n = 51) were brachypterous, as were 90 of 91 females; the single macropter was collected in mid-July. The collection of nymphs in May and July suggests bivoltinism. Nymphs and adults of a congener, C. venusta (Champion), were syntopic with C. bellula at a site in Grant County, Nebraska, which is the first specific locale recorded for C. venusta in the state. Corythaica bellula, whose adults are only 1.98 (brachypters) to 2.20 mm long (macropters), is part of the hidden biodiversity of the vast Nebraska Sandhills.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Bench or experimental · Consensus signal: Bench or experimental
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.106
Threshold uncertainty score0.426

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.201
Teacher spread0.183 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designBench or experimental
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueProceedings of the Entomological Society of WashingtonSame topicPlant Taxonomy and PhylogeneticsFrench-language works237,207