MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127936178 · doi:10.1112/plms.12504

Erdős–Hajnal for graphs with no 5‐hole

2023· article· en· W3127936178 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
fundA Canadian funder is recorded on the work.

Bibliographic record

VenueProceedings of the London Mathematical Society · 2023
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldMathematics
TopicLimits and Structures in Graph Theory
Canadian institutionsUniversity of Waterloo
FundersAir Force Office of Scientific ResearchEngineering and Physical Sciences Research CouncilNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaNational Science Foundation
KeywordsCombinatoricsMathematicsSplit graphConjectureCardinality (data modeling)Induced subgraphGraphComplement (music)CliqueCographExistential quantificationGraph factorizationBlock graphDistance-hereditary graphDiscrete mathematicsLine graphPathwidthGraph powerComputer scienceChemistryGene

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract The Erdős–Hajnal conjecture says that for every graph there exists such that every graph not containing as an induced subgraph has a clique or stable set of cardinality at least . We prove that this is true when is a cycle of length five. We also prove several further results: for instance, that if is a cycle and is the complement of a forest, there exists such that every graph containing neither of as an induced subgraph has a clique or stable set of cardinality at least .

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Theoretical or conceptual · Consensus signal: Theoretical or conceptual
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.087
Threshold uncertainty score0.542

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.001
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.024
GPT teacher head0.276
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it