Singular vector and singular subspace distribution for the matrix denoising model
Bibliographic record
Abstract
In this paper, we study the matrix denoising model $Y=S+X$, where $S$ is a low rank deterministic signal matrix and $X$ is a random noise matrix, and both are $M\times n$. In the scenario that $M$ and $n$ are comparably large and the signals are supercritical, we study the fluctuation of the outlier singular vectors of $Y$, under fully general assumptions on the structure of $S$ and the distribution of $X$. More specifically, we derive the limiting distribution of angles between the principal singular vectors of $Y$ and their deterministic counterparts, the singular vectors of $S$. Further, we also derive the distribution of the distance between the subspace spanned by the principal singular vectors of $Y$ and that spanned by the singular vectors of $S$. It turns out that the limiting distributions depend on the structure of the singular vectors of $S$ and the distribution of $X$, and thus they are nonuniversal. Statistical applications of our results to singular vector and singular subspace inferences are also discussed.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.005 | 0.016 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.004 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.003 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.002 | 0.002 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.003 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".