Bibliographic record
Abstract
O presente texto apresenta e discute ações de ocupação corpo-cidade, desenvolvidas no Rio de Janeiro entre 2015 e 2018, pelas integrantes e colaboradoras do Núcleo de Pesquisa, Estudos e Encontros em Dança – onucleo – DAC/UFRJ. Denominamos as referidas ações de práticas de estarcom, evidenciando a dimensão cartográfica, afetiva e conectiva do encontro entre corpo e território. As práticas de estarcom são fazeres de dança que não visam a exibição de movimentos coreográficos, mas atentam-se ao gesto, aos pré-movimentos, ao campo de forças e à abertura para a dimensão somática da presença. O estarcom configura-se como um gesto de cuidado coletivo e horizontal pensado a partir de perspectivas decoloniais ligadas a aproximação com a cosmovisão dos povos originários. Através das práticas de estarcom afirmamos o cuidado como ação coletiva que possibilita a partilha de experiências da ordem da alegria, do bem viver e da convivência com a diferença.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.004 | 0.006 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.002 | 0.003 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.008 | 0.014 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.009 | 0.004 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.008 |
| Research integrity | 0.003 | 0.003 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.014 | 0.002 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".