MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127945027 · doi:10.12957/mnemosine.2020.57655

Práticas de estarcom como gesto de cuidado e criação

2020· article· pt· W3127945027 on OpenAlex
Lidia Larangeira

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.

Bibliographic record

VenueMnemosine · 2020
Typearticle
Languagept
FieldSocial Sciences
TopicUrban and sociocultural dynamics
Canadian institutionsWSP (Canada)
Fundersnot available
KeywordsHumanitiesArt

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

O presente texto apresenta e discute ações de ocupação corpo-cidade, desenvolvidas no Rio de Janeiro entre 2015 e 2018, pelas integrantes e colaboradoras do Núcleo de Pesquisa, Estudos e Encontros em Dança – onucleo – DAC/UFRJ. Denominamos as referidas ações de práticas de estarcom, evidenciando a dimensão cartográfica, afetiva e conectiva do encontro entre corpo e território. As práticas de estarcom são fazeres de dança que não visam a exibição de movimentos coreográficos, mas atentam-se ao gesto, aos pré-movimentos, ao campo de forças e à abertura para a dimensão somática da presença. O estarcom configura-se como um gesto de cuidado coletivo e horizontal pensado a partir de perspectivas decoloniais ligadas a aproximação com a cosmovisão dos povos originários. Através das práticas de estarcom afirmamos o cuidado como ação coletiva que possibilita a partilha de experiências da ordem da alegria, do bem viver e da convivência com a diferença.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesMeta-epidemiology (narrow)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.502
Threshold uncertainty score1.000

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0010.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.001

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.073
GPT teacher head0.324
Teacher spread0.251 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it