Electrical Resistivity of FeS at High Pressures and Temperatures: Implications of Thermal Transport in the Core of Ganymede
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Abstract Terrestrial‐type planetary cores are thought to be predominantly composed of Fe with varying amounts of lighter chemical species or impurities chosen from a narrow range of possible elements, which includes S. These impurity elements may contribute significant effects to the transport properties of these cores, which have direct influence over dynamo and thermal evolution of the planetary body. Recent experimental methods have partially eased the substantial challenges that arise in direct measurements of electrical transport properties at high pressures and temperatures. In this study we show how this methodology can be used to measure the electrical resistivity of a sample in powder form. The electrical resistivity of FeS was measured in both solid and molten states at pressures up to 5 GPa and the thermal conductivity was calculated using the Wiedemann–Franz Law from the electrical measurements. The results showed FeS is notably more electrically and thermally conductive when compared to previous studies in both the solid and molten states. The results were used to estimate the adiabatic conductive heat flow of a molten FeS core model of Ganymede, which showed that thermal convection is permissible as a dynamo power source.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".