Data-Driven Multiobjective Predictive Optimal Control of Refining Process With Non-Gaussian Stochastic Distribution Dynamics
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
The fiber length and the Canadian standard freeness (CSF) are two key indices in measuring pulp quality of the refining process with non-Gaussian stochastic distribution dynamics. Among them, it is defective to use the conventional 1-D average fiber length (AFL) as a pulp quality index because the AFL is insufficient to describe the 2-D probability density function (pdf) shaping of fiber length distribution (FLD) with non-Gaussian types. In this article, a data-driven multiobjective predictive optimal control method is proposed to control the 2-D pdf shaping of FLD and the 1-D CSF, simultaneously. First, a radial basis function neural network (RBF-NN) based stochastic distribution model is developed to approximate the 2-D pdf shaping of FLD, and the parameters of RBF basis functions are updated by an iterative learning rule. Then, taking the developed pulp quality models, including the 2-D pdf model of FLD and the model of 1-D CSF as two predictors, a multiobjective predictive controller is designed by solving the nonlinear programming problems with constraints. Then, the stability of the resulted closed-loop system is also analyzed. Ultimately, the industrial experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed method.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it