τ9 Eri: a bright pulsating magnetic Bp star in a 5.95-d double-lined spectroscopic binary
Bibliographic record
Abstract
ABSTRACT τ9 Eri is a Bp star that was previously reported to be a single-lined spectroscopic binary. Using 17 ESPaDOnS spectropolarimetric (Stokes V) observations, we identified the weak spectral lines of the secondary component and detected a strong magnetic field in the primary. We performed orbital analysis of the radial velocities of both components to find a slightly eccentric orbit (e = 0.129) with a period of 5.95382(2) d. The longitudinal magnetic field (Bℓ) of the primary was measured from each of the Stokes V profiles, with typical error bars smaller than 10 G. Equivalent widths (EWs) of least-squares deconvolution profiles corresponding to only the Fe lines were also measured. We performed frequency analysis of both the Bℓ and EW measurements, as well as of the Hipparcos, SMEI, and TESS photometric data. All sets of photometric observations produce two clear, strong candidates for the rotation period of the Bp star: 1.21 and 3.82 d. The Bℓ and EW measurements are consistent with only the 3.82-d period. We conclude that HD 25267 consists of a late-type Bp star (M = $3.6_{-0.2}^{+0.1}~\mathrm{ M}_\odot$, T = $12580_{-120}^{+150}$ K) with a rotation period of 3.82262(4) d orbiting with a period of 5.95382(2) d with a late-A/early-F type secondary companion (M = 1.6 ± 0.1 M⊙, T = $7530_{-510}^{+580}$ K). The Bp star’s magnetic field is approximately dipolar with i = 41 ± 2°, β = 158 ± 5°, and Bd = 1040 ± 50 G. All evidence points to the strong 1.209912(3)-d period detected in photometry, along with several other weaker photometric signals, as arising from g-mode pulsations in the primary.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
How this classification was reachedexpand
Full frame machine prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.
Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.002 | 0.001 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from itClassification
machine, unvalidatedMachine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.
How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".