Seismic Performance of Cross Laminated Timber (CLT) Platform Building by Incremental Dynamic Analysis
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
<p>The present study performed Incremental Dynamic Analysis on a case study Cross-laminated timber (CLT) platform building. The building was designed for the seismic modification factors of Rd=2.0 and Ro=1.5 for the soil Class C in Vancouver, BC, Canada. A 2D non-linear finite element model was developed in OpenSees. CLT panels were modelled as orthotropic elastic shell elements and the connections were modelled as non-linear springs that account for both uplift and shear deformation. The connections and wall parameters for hysteresis models were calibrated from test results. The seismic performance of the building was evaluated using the 22 bi-axial ground motions. The seismic demand was recorded in terms of inter-storey drift ratio. The results indicated that the case study CLT platform building has a sufficient factor of safety against collapse (Collapse Margin Ratio of 3.1) under a Maximum Credible Earthquake.</p>
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it