MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3127982183 · doi:10.5539/ijef.v13n2p52

The Influence of CSR Practices on the Financial Performance of Microfinance Institutions in Togo

2021· article· en· W3127982183 on OpenAlexaffvenue
Akouvi Gadedjisso-Tossou, Curwitch P’ham Bodjona, Maman Tachiwou Aboudou, Jean‐Pierre Gueyié

Bibliographic record

VenueInternational Journal of Economics and Finance · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEconomics, Econometrics and Finance
TopicMicrofinance and Financial Inclusion
Canadian institutionsUniversité du Québec à Montréal
Fundersnot available
KeywordsMicrofinanceCorporate social responsibilityProfitability indexBusinessPovertyAccountingFinancial systemFinanceEconomicsEconomic growthPolitical sciencePublic relations

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Microfinance pursues a dual objective: reduce poverty (social performance) and ensure lasting profitability (financial performance). However, beyond these two performances, microfinance institutions (MFIs) have a social responsibility (CSR) towards their stakeholders. The main objective of this article is to measure the influence of the CSR practices of Togolese MFIs on their financial performance. The analysis is conducted over a sample of 60 Togolese MFIs, using the principal component analysis and generalized least squares techniques. The results show that CSR through the dimensions customer, employees and community positively and significantly impact on the financial performance of MFIs when measured by ROA, while the environment dimension has a negative significant influence.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.003
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.029
Threshold uncertainty score0.057

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.003
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0010.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.001
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.001
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.036
GPT teacher head0.259
Teacher spread0.222 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueInternational Journal of Economics and FinanceSame topicMicrofinance and Financial InclusionFrench-language works237,207