MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3128016313 · doi:10.1101/602672

A global perspective on microbial diversity in the terrestrial deep subsurface

2019· preprint· en· W3128016313 on OpenAlexafffund
André Soares, Arwyn Edwards, De-Feng An, Alexandre Bagnoud, Malin Bomberg, Karen Budwill, Sean M. Caffrey, Matthew W. Fields, Jeffrey A. Gralnick, Vitaly V. Kadnikov, Lily Momper, Magdalena R. Osburn, John W. Moreau, Duane P. Moser, Andre Mu, Lotta Purkamo, Sara M. E. Rassner, Cody S. Sheik, Barbara Sherwood Lollar, Brandy M. Toner, Gerrit Voordouw, Katinka Wouters, Andrew C. Mitchell

Bibliographic record

VenuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory) · 2019
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEnvironmental Science
TopicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology
Canadian institutionsUniversity of TorontoFuture EarthAlberta InnovatesUniversity of Calgary
FundersNatural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of CanadaMcMaster UniversityNational Park ServiceHigher Education Funding Council for WalesLlywodraeth CymruU.S. Department of Energy
KeywordsGammaproteobacteriaBetaproteobacteriaEcologyAquiferFirmicutesMetagenomicsGroundwaterBiologyEarth scienceGeologyActinobacteriaPaleontology16S ribosomal RNA

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Summary While recent efforts to catalogue Earth’s microbial diversity have focused upon surface and marine habitats, 12% to 20% of Earth’s bacterial and archaeal biomass is suggested to inhabit the terrestrial deep subsurface, compared to ∼1.8% in the deep subseafloor 1–3 . Metagenomic studies of the terrestrial deep subsurface have yielded a trove of divergent and functionally important microbiomes from a range of localities 4–6 . However, a wider perspective of microbial diversity and its relationship to environmental conditions within the terrestrial deep subsurface is still required. Here, we show the diversity of bacterial communities in deep subsurface groundwater is controlled by aquifer lithology globally, by using 16S rRNA gene datasets collected across five countries on two continents and from fifteen rock types over the past decade. Furthermore, our meta-analysis reveals that terrestrial deep subsurface microbiota are dominated by Betaproteobacteria, Gammaproteobacteria and Firmicutes, likely as a function of the diverse metabolic strategies of these taxa. Despite this similarity, evidence was found not only for aquifer-specific microbial communities, but also for a common small consortium of prevalent Betaproteobacteria and Gammaproteobacterial OTUs across the localities. This finding implies a core terrestrial deep subsurface community, irrespective of aquifer lithology, that may play an important role in colonising and sustaining microbial habitats in the deep terrestrial subsurface. An in-silico contamination-aware approach to analysing this dataset underscores the importance of downstream methods for assuring that robust conclusions can be reached from deep subsurface-derived sequencing data. Understanding the global panorama of microbial diversity and ecological dynamics in the deep terrestrial subsurface provides a first step towards understanding the role of microbes in global subsurface element and nutrient cycling.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.001
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.002
Threshold uncertainty score0.007

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.001
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.004
Science and technology studies0.0000.001
Scholarly communication0.0020.002
Open science0.0000.002
Research integrity0.0010.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0020.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.018
GPT teacher head0.230
Teacher spread0.213 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations7
Published2019
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venuebioRxiv (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory)→Same topicMicrobial Community Ecology and Physiology→French-language works237,207→