Machine learning approaches for predicting biomolecule–disease associations
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Biomolecules, such as microRNAs, circRNAs, lncRNAs and genes, are functionally interdependent in human cells, and all play critical roles in diverse fundamental and vital biological processes. The dysregulations of such biomolecules can cause diseases. Identifying the associations between biomolecules and diseases can uncover the mechanisms of complex diseases, which is conducive to their diagnosis, treatment, prognosis and prevention. Due to the time consumption and cost of biologically experimental methods, many computational association prediction methods have been proposed in the past few years. In this study, we provide a comprehensive review of machine learning-based approaches for predicting disease-biomolecule associations with multi-view data sources. Firstly, we introduce some databases and general strategies for integrating multi-view data sources in the prediction models. Then we discuss several feature representation methods for machine learning-based prediction models. Thirdly, we comprehensively review machine learning-based prediction approaches in three categories: basic machine learning methods, matrix completion-based methods and deep learning-based methods, while discussing their advantages and disadvantages. Finally, we provide some perspectives for further improving biomolecule-disease prediction methods.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it