MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128142718 · doi:10.1089/trgh.2020.0112

Experiences of Transgender Participants in Emergency Departments: Findings from the OutLook Study

2021· article· en· W3128142718 on OpenAlex

Why this work is in the frame

A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.

affAt least one author lists a Canadian institution in the pinned OpenAlex snapshot.
aboutThe title or abstract carries a Canadian signal from the geographic lexicon.

Bibliographic record

VenueTransgender Health · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldPsychology
TopicLGBTQ Health, Identity, and Policy
Canadian institutionsWilfrid Laurier University
Fundersnot available
KeywordsTransphobiaTransgenderLogistic regressionLesbianPsychologyEmergency departmentHealth careSocial supportPsychological resilienceMedicineClinical psychologySocial psychologyPsychiatry

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Purpose: Even in cases of medical emergency, mistreatment and negative experiences in life or in medical settings can deter trans patients from seeking necessary care. The purpose of this study was to identify factors associated with trans persons' emergency department (ED) avoidance in the mixed urban-rural Region of Waterloo, Ontario, Canada. Methods: The OutLook Study was a community-based partnership that created an online, cross-sectional questionnaire for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and other sexual and gender minority community members. Participants in this analysis were 16 years of age or older, lived, worked, or attended school in Waterloo Region, and identified as trans ( n =112). Binary logistic regression was used to test associations between sociodemographic, resilience, and risk variables, and ED avoidance. Sociodemographic variables statistically significant at p <0.05 at the bivariate level were included as controls to explore different combinations of resilience and risk factor in multivariable models. Results: Participants reporting complete or partially complete medical transitions were more likely to report ED avoidance, compared to those who had not initiated medical transition. Elevated transphobia was associated with greater likelihood of avoidance. However, increasing levels of social support decreased the likelihood of avoidance. In multivariable models, social support, support from a special person, and transphobia were always significant, regardless of controlled variables. Conclusion: Transphobia—enacted in the contexts of everyday life and health care—can deter patients from seeking care. Patient-centered care requires careful attention to trans identity and health needs, especially in emergency settings. In the absence of structural changes, providers can take steps to mitigate the erasure and discrimination trans patients experience and anticipate when accessing EDs.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.335
Threshold uncertainty score0.996

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0050.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.168
GPT teacher head0.450
Teacher spread0.282 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it