MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3128157541 · doi:10.1002/essoar.10501798.1

Subsoil organic carbon response to land use in mountain soils

2020· article· en· W3128157541 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
Stéphanie Grand, Magalì Matteodo, Anaïs Fayolle, Valentine Turberg, David Sebag, Pascal Vittoz, Eric Verrecchia

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldAgricultural and Biological Sciences
TopicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsSubsoilTopsoilSoil waterEnvironmental scienceSoil carbonSoil organic matterSoil scienceBorealHydrology (agriculture)Geology

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Soils of mountain regions are estimated to contain large amounts of organic matter (OM), equivalent to stocks found in high-latitude boreal and tundra soils. Mountain environments are also experiencing profound changes in land management under the influence of socio-economic pressures as well as the need to adapt to climate change, which is occurring at a faster rate than in lowland areas. These anthropogenic impacts are expected to strongly affect soil OM storage. Most studies of land-use change have however focused on topsoil OM; whether similar trends will hold true for subsoil OM remains unknown. Using Rock-Eval pyrolysis as a proxy for soil OM dynamics, we showed that the hierarchy of controls on OM properties and transformations varied greatly with increasing soil depth. In the topsoil, OM properties were related to the nature of plant inputs, their degree of in-mixing with the mineral matrix and the occurrence of seasonal water saturation. In the subsoil however, the foremost predictors of OM properties were geochemical parameters. This shift in the nature of determinants of OM dynamics indicates that shallow and deep soil OM pools should respond differently to external forcings. Podzolic profiles showed the strongest decoupling of topsoil and subsoil OM properties. We focused on this soil type to specifically investigate the effects of land use on subsoil OM. We selected field sites from the Coastal Range of British Columbia, Canada and the Pennine Alps, Switzerland representing undisturbed and managed forest, shrubland and pasture. Samples were analyzed for organic C content, OM quality and reactive mineralogy. Results showed that herbaceous cover was associated with an increase in topsoil but not subsoil OM. In the subsoil, variations in OM content and properties were associated with changes in reactive Al and Fe mineral phases. Overall, our data indicate that organo-mineral and organo-metal interactions are of prime importance to OM accumulation in the subsoil, and that understanding the response of deep soil C stocks to land use change will require consideration of the geochemical and mineralogical environment. Our results further suggest that so-called reactive mineral phases may themselves be impacted by land use, in turn affecting deep soil C stabilization and destabilization processes.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.095
Threshold uncertainty score0.189

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0010.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.025
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.190 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2020
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicSoil Carbon and Nitrogen Dynamics→French-language works237,207→