MétaCan
Menu
← Back to cohort
Record W3128184450 · doi:10.5194/tc-2021-18

InSAR monitoring of Arctic land fast sea ice deformation using L-band ALOS-2, C-band Radarsat-2 and Sentinel-1

2021· article· en· W3128184450 on OpenAlexafffundabout
Zhaohua Chen, Benoît Montpetit, Sarah Banks, Lori White, Amir Behnamian, Jason Duffe, Jon Pasher

Bibliographic record

Venuenot available
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics
Canadian institutionsEnvironment and Climate Change Canada
FundersCanadian Space AgencyEuropean Space AgencyJapan Aerospace Exploration AgencyNational Aeronautics and Space Administration
KeywordsSea iceGeologyInterferometric synthetic aperture radarArctic ice packArcticSynthetic aperture radarSea ice thicknessRemote sensingGeodesyClimatologyOceanography

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

Abstract. Arctic amplification is accelerating changes in sea ice regimes in the Canadian Arctic with later freeze-up and earlier melt events, adversely affecting Arctic wildlife and communities that depend on the stability of the sea ice conditions. To monitor both the rate and impact of such change, there is a need to accurately measure sea ice deformation, an important component for understanding ice motion and polar climate. This paper presents Interferometric Synthetic Aperture Radar (InSAR) monitoring of Arctic landfast sea ice deformation as a result of thickness changes measured from ice draft and surface height using C-band Radarsat-2, Sentinel-1 and L-band ALOS-2. The small baseline subset (SBAS) approach was explored to process time series observations for retrieval of temporal deformation changes over the winter. Sea ice deformation (subsidence and uplift in the range of −32–57 cm) detected from satellite SAR data in Cambridge Bay, Nunavut, Canada during the winter of 2018–2019 was found to be in a range of values corresponding to the ice draft growth (30–62 cm) measured from an in-situ ice profiler. The trends of InSAR observations from Sentinel-1 were also consistent with ice surface height changes along two ground tracks detected from ICESat-2. SAR backscatter from Sentinel-1 also corresponded to the surface height with strong correlation coefficient (0.49–0.83). High coherence over ice from C-band was maintained over a shorter acquisition interval than L-band due to temporal decorrelation.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Observational · Consensus signal: Observational
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.076
Threshold uncertainty score0.152

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.015
GPT teacher head0.215
Teacher spread0.200 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designObservational
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes3
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same topicArctic and Antarctic ice dynamics→French-language works237,207→