MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128185572 · doi:10.1190/geo2020-0629.1

Accelerating least-squares Kirchhoff time migration using beam methodology

2021· article· en· W3128185572 on OpenAlexaff
Yubo Yue, Yujin Liu, Samuel H. Gray

Bibliographic record

VenueGeophysics · 2021
Typearticle
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicSeismic Imaging and Inversion Techniques
Canadian institutionsAlberta Energy
FundersNational Natural Science Foundation of China
KeywordsSeismic migrationLeast-squares function approximationAlgorithmStackingComputer scienceOffset (computer science)Beam (structure)Quadratic equationTRACE (psycholinguistics)DiffractionOpticsGeologyMathematicsGeometryPhysicsSeismologyStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

ABSTRACT Least-squares migration is an advanced imaging technique capable of producing images with improved spatial resolution, balanced illumination, and reduced migration artifacts; however, the prohibitive computational cost poses a great challenge for its practical application. We have incorporated the beam methodology into the implementation of Kirchhoff time modeling/migration and developed a fast common-offset least-squares Kirchhoff beam time migration (LSKBTM). Different from conventional Kirchhoff time modeling/migration in which the seismic data are modeled/migrated trace by trace, the mapping operation in Kirchhoff beam time modeling/migration is performed in terms of beam components and is performed only at sparsely sampled beam centers. Therefore, the computational cost of LSKBTM is significantly reduced in comparison with that of least-squares Kirchhoff time migration (LSKTM). In addition, based on the second-order Taylor expansion of the diffraction traveltime, we introduce a quadratic correction term into the inverse/forward local slant stacking, effectively enhancing the computational accuracy of LSKBTM. We used 2D synthetic and 3D field data examples to verify the effectiveness of our method. Our results indicate that LSKBTM can produce images comparable with those of LSKTM, but at considerably reduced computational cost.

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Other design · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.827
Threshold uncertainty score0.704

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.000
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0010.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.077
GPT teacher head0.272
Teacher spread0.194 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designOther design
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations10
Published2021
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueGeophysicsSame topicSeismic Imaging and Inversion TechniquesFrench-language works237,207