MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W3128192127 · doi:10.1029/2021ms002492

Rotating Shallow Water Flow Under Location Uncertainty With a Structure‐Preserving Discretization

2021· preprint· en· W3128192127 on OpenAlexafffund
Rüdiger Brecht, Long Li, Werner Bauer, Étienne Mémin

Bibliographic record

VenueJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth Systems · 2021
Typepreprint
Languageen
FieldEarth and Planetary Sciences
TopicMeteorological Phenomena and Simulations
Canadian institutionsMemorial University of Newfoundland
FundersMitacsAgence Nationale de la RechercheNatural Environment Research CouncilSight Research UK
KeywordsDiscretizationInviscid flowFlow (mathematics)Temporal discretizationNoise (video)Applied mathematicsMathematicsRealization (probability)Finite volume methodScale (ratio)Representation (politics)Stochastic modellingMathematical optimizationStatistical physicsComputer scienceMathematical analysisGeometryPhysicsClassical mechanicsMechanicsStatistics

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

<p>We introduce a new representation of the rotating shallow water equations based on a stochastic transport principle. The derivation relies on a decomposition of the fluid flow into a large-scale component and a noise term that models the unresolved small-scale flow. The total energy of such a random model is demonstrated to be preserved along time for any realization. Thus, we propose to combine a structure-preserving discretization of the underlying deterministic model with the discrete stochastic terms. This way, our method can directly be used in existing dynamical cores of global numerical weather prediction and climate models. For an inviscid test case on the f-plane we use a homogenous noise and illustrate that the spatial part of the stochastic scheme preserves the total energy of the system. Finally, using an inhomogenous noise, we show  that the proposed random model better captures the structure of a large-scale flow than a comparable deterministic model for a barotropically unstable jet on the sphere.</p>

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.001
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Simulation or modeling · Consensus signal: Simulation or modeling
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: Empirical
Teacher disagreement score0.291
Threshold uncertainty score0.611

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0010.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0010.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.000
Science and technology studies0.0000.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.001
Open science0.0000.000
Research integrity0.0000.001
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.000

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.023
GPT teacher head0.249
Teacher spread0.225 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designSimulation or modeling
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations4
Published2021
Admission routes2
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venueJournal of Advances in Modeling Earth SystemsSame topicMeteorological Phenomena and SimulationsFrench-language works237,207