MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W312820264

今日伊拉克国家档案馆(INLA)概述

2008· article· zh· W312820264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
刘静一

Bibliographic record

Venue云南档案 · 2008
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

一、2003年以来伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆 2003年4月10和12日,就在萨达姆政权倒台后不久,伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆(Iraq National Library and Archives,注:像世界上一些国家图书馆和档案馆一样,例如加拿大国家图书馆和档案馆(Library and Archives Canada),伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆是两馆合一)经受了两次大火的洗礼,档案资料损失60%、珍本图书损失95%、手稿损失25%。当年新上任的馆长萨德·伊斯康德(Saad Eskander)除了获得各国图书馆及不同组织的捐赠外,带领全馆人员经过三年多努力,终于在2006年12月使得该馆得以开放。人们对于伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆的重新开放感到惊喜的同时不免也有一丝担忧。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame distilled prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.000
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.000
Version: codex-gemma-dda1882f352aValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesInsufficient payload (model declined to judge)
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: Not applicable
GenreCandidate signal: Empirical · Consensus signal: none
Teacher disagreement score0.883
Threshold uncertainty score0.988

Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0000.001
Science and technology studies0.0010.000
Scholarly communication0.0000.009
Open science0.0020.000
Research integrity0.0000.000
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0000.013

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one teacher head, not a consensus.

Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreEmpirical

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue云南档案Same topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207