MétaCan
Menu
Back to cohort
Record W312820264

今日伊拉克国家档案馆(INLA)概述

2008· article· zh· W312820264 on OpenAlexaboutno aff
刘静一

Bibliographic record

Venue云南档案 · 2008
Typearticle
Languagezh
FieldComputer Science
TopicLibrary Science and Information Systems
Canadian institutionsnot available
Fundersnot available
KeywordsComputer science
DOInot available

Abstract

fetched live from OpenAlex

一、2003年以来伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆 2003年4月10和12日,就在萨达姆政权倒台后不久,伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆(Iraq National Library and Archives,注:像世界上一些国家图书馆和档案馆一样,例如加拿大国家图书馆和档案馆(Library and Archives Canada),伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆是两馆合一)经受了两次大火的洗礼,档案资料损失60%、珍本图书损失95%、手稿损失25%。当年新上任的馆长萨德·伊斯康德(Saad Eskander)除了获得各国图书馆及不同组织的捐赠外,带领全馆人员经过三年多努力,终于在2006年12月使得该馆得以开放。人们对于伊拉克国家图书馆和档案馆的重新开放感到惊喜的同时不免也有一丝担忧。

Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.

How this classification was reachedexpand

Full frame machine prediction

Teacher imitation

Not calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. The Gemma side is a direct model label for every work in the frame, read from the title-only record. The Codex side is a classifier learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and calibrated to design-weighted sample rates; fields without enough sample support carry no Codex call. Candidate is the union of the two sides; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels.

metaresearch head score (Codex)0.003
metaresearch head score (Gemma)0.005
Version: metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061cValidation status: machine_predicted_unvalidated
Candidate categoriesnone
Consensus categoriesnone
DomainCandidate signal: none · Consensus signal: none
Study designCandidate signal: Not applicable · Consensus signal: none
GenreCandidate signal: Other · Consensus signal: Other
Teacher disagreement score0.206
Threshold uncertainty score0.410

Distilled classifier scores by category (both heads)

CategoryCodexGemma
Metaresearch0.0030.005
Meta-epidemiology (narrow)0.0000.000
Meta-epidemiology (broad)0.0000.000
Bibliometrics0.0020.003
Science and technology studies0.0130.010
Scholarly communication0.0140.007
Open science0.0010.003
Research integrity0.0020.003
Insufficient payload (model declined to judge)0.0300.004

Machine scores (provisional)

The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.

Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.

Opus teacher head0.043
GPT teacher head0.217
Teacher spread0.175 · how far apart the two teachers sit on this one work
Validation statusscore_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it

Classification

machine, unvalidated

Machine predicted; a candidate call from one source (direct Gemma or distilled Codex), not a consensus.

The models applied no category: nothing in the taxonomy fit this work.
Study designNot applicable
Domainnot available
GenreOther

How this classification was reached, model by model and score by score, is at the end of the page under "How this classification was reached".

Quick stats

Citations0
Published2008
Admission routes1
Has abstractyes

Explore more

Same venue云南档案Same topicLibrary Science and Information SystemsFrench-language works237,207