JARINGAN SYARAF TIRUAN MEMPREDIKSI KEBUTUHAN OBAT-OBATAN MENGGUNAKAN METODE BACKPROPAGATION
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
Health development is directed at increasing awareness, willingness and ability to live for everyone so that the highest public health status can be realized. In the current era of regional autonomy where health development is the responsibility of the regional government, the regions must be able to regulate themselves, one of which is in fulfilling their drug needs. To fulfill the need for medicine, good processing and planning are needed. One of the facilities or facilities needed for optimal health services to the community is the need for support in the form of drug availability for basic health services to suit their needs. Backpropagation is a multilayer Artificial Neural Network training because the backpropagation method has three layers in the training process, namely the input layer, hidden layer and output layer, where backpropagation is the development of a single layer network (Single Screen Network) which has two layers, namely the input layer and output layer. The drug data used were 2010 to 2019. With a maximum epoch of 0-10000, learning rate 0.1 and target errors ranging from 0.01 to 0.003 to produce convergent results. The results of the prediction of the number of drugs after carrying out the training process and testing have increased and decreased.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.002 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.001 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Open science | 0.002 | 0.001 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.003 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it