Intelligent Stress Monitoring Assistant for First Responders
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
This paper describes a prototype of an intelligent Stress Monitoring Assistant (SMA), - the next generation of stress detectors. The SMA is intended for the first responders and professionals coping with exposure to extreme physical and psychological stressors, e.g. firefighters, combat military personnel, explosive ordnance disposal operatives, law enforcement officers, emergency medical technicians, and paramedics. Stress impacts human behavior and decision-making, which can be propagated between the team members. The SMA is an integral part of the Decision Support System, it is a component of the decision support perception-action cycle. We model this cycle as a cognitive dynamic system. The intelligent part of the SMA is designed using a) a residual-temporal convolution network for learning data from sensors and detection of stress features, and b) a reasoning mechanism based on a causal network for fusion at various levels. The SMA prototype has been tested using a multi-factor physiological dataset WEarable Stress and Affect Detection (WESAD). In both modes, the stress recognition and stress detection, the SMA achieves an accuracy of 86% and 98% for the WESAD dataset, respectively. This performance is superior to the known results in satisfying the requirements of reliable decision support.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it