De la panique morale à la production expertale
Why this work is in the frame
A frame that forgets how it found something cannot be audited. These are the routes that admitted this work.
Bibliographic record
Abstract
La categorie de gang de rue construit depuis les trente dernieres annees au Quebec l’image d’une jeunesse presentee comme nouvelle classe dangereuse, issue des classes populaires et des minorites racisees. Emergeant d’abord au sein du champ mediatique a la fin des annees 1980, la categorie a ete l’objet d’une importante production criminologique dans la seconde moitie des annees 1990, legitimant une reorientation des politiques publiques montrealaises du traitement penal de la jeunesse. Inspires par une perspective genealogique, nous decrirons d’abord l’emergence d’une preoccupation mediatique pour les gangs de rue, revelant la maniere dont, sur fond de racisme anti-Noir, un consensus a progressivement emerge autour de la necessite d’agir sur un phenomene dont l’existence meme etait pourtant initialement contestee. Nous reviendrons ensuite sur l’investissement expertal de la categorie, mettant en evidence la maniere dont son efficacite symbolique a stimule la production d’un ensemble de travaux criminologiques qui ont contribue a en etendre l’usage sans pour autant lever son flou constitutif. Nous montrerons enfin comment, legitimant la diffusion d’une logique mondialisee de gestion des risques, la categorie s’est imposee jusqu’au cœur des jeux relationnels qui structurent les pratiques quotidiennes de suivi des jeunes delinquants montrealais.
Fetched live from OpenAlex and de-inverted. Abstracts are not stored in this database: the inverted indexes are 8.6 GB of the frame’s 9.3 GB of text, and the host has 13 GB free.
Full frame distilled prediction
Teacher imitationNot calibrated prevalence, not ground truth. Human validation pending. Learned from the 10,348 direct Codex labels and 10,348 direct Gemma labels. Candidate is the union of thresholded teacher heads; consensus is their intersection. These outputs are machine_predicted_unvalidated and are not human labels or direct frontier model labels.
Codex and Gemma teacher scores by category
| Category | Codex | Gemma |
|---|---|---|
| Metaresearch | 0.001 | 0.001 |
| Meta-epidemiology (narrow) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Meta-epidemiology (broad) | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Bibliometrics | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Science and technology studies | 0.000 | 0.001 |
| Scholarly communication | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Open science | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Research integrity | 0.000 | 0.000 |
| Insufficient payload (model declined to judge) | 0.001 | 0.000 |
Machine scores (provisional)
The two teacher heads of the student model, read on this work. A score orders the frame for review; it never asserts a category, and the validation status ships verbatim with every row.
Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed, 7 training rounds). Scores rank; they never assert a category.
score_only:v0-immature-baseline · verbatim from the scoring run: score_only means the number may rank works, and no category label ships from it